<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Pipe and a Keyboard &#187; Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theotherfellow.com/category/blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theotherfellow.com</link>
	<description>The saner side of insanity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stumbleupon</title>
		<link>http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/17/stumbleupon/</link>
		<comments>http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/17/stumbleupon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 14:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/17/stumbleupon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I confess I know little about Stumbleupon. I know the general principle – you like something, you Stumble it – but it still baffles me. A couple of years ago, an article in Head Rambles was Stumbled.&#160;&#160; The effect was virtually instantaneous and a little alarming.&#160; My hosting company phoned me to say they were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I confess I know little about <a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" target="_blank">Stumbleupon</a>.</p>
<p>I know the general principle – you like something, you Stumble it – but it still baffles me.</p>
<p>A couple of years ago, an article in <a href="http://www.headrambles.com/2007/10/10/how-to-survive-your-first-guinness/" target="_blank">Head Rambles</a> was Stumbled.&#160;&#160; The effect was virtually instantaneous and a little alarming.&#160; My hosting company phoned me to say they were on alert because of traffic to the server, it was that bad (or good, depending on your point of view).</p>
<p>Since then, that article has ridden through several Stumble Storms, as I call them.&#160; None has been as powerful as the original, but they still cause massive traffic.</p>
<p><a href="http://theotherfellow.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Stumble1.jpg"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px" title="Stumble Graph 1" border="0" alt="Stumble Graph 1" src="http://theotherfellow.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Stumble1_thumb.jpg" width="454" height="116" /></a> The graph above clearly shows the initial storm on October ‘08.&#160; The majority of the little stalagmite peaks after that are mini-storms.&#160; They appear to occur at random intervals and random intensity.</p>
<p>There is a storm in progress as I write this.</p>
<p><a href="http://theotherfellow.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Stumble2.jpg"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="Stumble2" border="0" alt="Stumble2" src="http://theotherfellow.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Stumble2_thumb.jpg" width="454" height="194" /></a> </p>
<p>The graph above shows hourly traffic over a seven day period.&#160; The storm started at around eleven last night and is easing off now, but the effect is very clear.&#160; As storms go, it was a very minor one, but I’m not complaining.</p>
<p>What does baffle me is where these storms originate.&#160; I have searched Stumbleupon and can find no mention of <a href="http://headrambles.com" target="_blank">Head Rambles</a>.&#160; Presumably though there is a page somewhere that people are seeing?&#160; Has it risen up the ranks again for a brief moment of glory?&#160; </p>
<p>I have a lot to learn about this Internet lark!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/17/stumbleupon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copying a WP site into WPMU</title>
		<link>http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/11/copying-a-wp-site-into-wpmu/</link>
		<comments>http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/11/copying-a-wp-site-into-wpmu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/11/copying-a-wp-site-into-wpmu/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I look after nine blogs. Six of them are on my own servers and three have their own hosting.&#160; After my last post, I thought I would try an experiment – to combine several of those blogs under one roof, so simplify maintenance and to streamline things.&#160; Checking nine blogs on a regular basis for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look after nine blogs.</p>
<p>Six of them are on my own servers and three have their own hosting.&#160; After my last post, I thought I would try an experiment – to combine several of those blogs under one roof, so simplify maintenance and to streamline things.&#160; Checking nine blogs on a regular basis for updates and upgrades can be tedious.</p>
<p>I set up WordPress MU on a test site.&#160; For the sake of the test, I used a few spare domains I had lying around.</p>
<p>Installation of WPMU is simplicity itself, requiring only the basic knowledge of how to install a database [I used Cpanel] and the ability to change permissions on the server [again using Cpanel].</p>
<p>Having set up the root blog, I set up a subsidiary blog, and decided to try to mirror this site on it.&#160; Once again, setting up the blog could not have been easier, but then my troubles started – how to I import all the features of this site onto the new one?&#160; I want the two sites to be precise mirrors, so this involves copying the theme, the posts, comments, images, tags, categories and links.</p>
<p>Copying the theme is simple.&#160; I just took a copy of the live theme folder, put it in the WPMU installation and activated it.</p>
<p>Copying the posts was relatively simple too.&#160; All I did was to export the XML file from this site and then import into the other.&#160; This gave me the ability to copy all the images as well which was just what I wanted.</p>
<p>I was now left with a problem.&#160; The XML export/import facility does not include links or link categories.&#160; This required a bit of lateral thinking.</p>
<p>In the end, I decided to use the sledgehammer approach. Using PHPMyAdmin, I exported this site’s entire database <em>excluding</em> “wp_options”, “wp_users” and “wp_usermeta”.&#160; I then opened the downloaded file and made a simple change.</p>
<p>To explain the change I made, it is necessary to understand the construction of the WPMU database.&#160; The root blog will contain its records in, for example “wp_posts”.&#160; Anything starting with wp_ pertains to the root, or the global site.&#160; The individual sub blogs contain a numerical prefix, so you will end up with “wp_2_posts”, “wp_3_posts” and so on.</p>
<p>I ascertained which prefix my sub blog was using and then did a simple find and replace on the entire database dump, replacing “wp_” with “wp_2_” or whatever the prefix is.&#160; I then imported this file into the new WPMU database.</p>
<p>It may seem that I have duplicated things here, as I had already imported the posts and comments, but I did that essentially to just import the images.&#160; I overwrote the information to maintain the integrity of all the ‘meta’ tables.</p>
<p>The result is rather effective – you can see it <a href="http://curratech.net/theotherfellow/" target="_blank">here</a>, though please don’t leave any comments on it, as they will be dumped! </p>
<p>My next problem [and it’s a big one], is how to map my domain to pont as an alias to the new site.&#160; So far, I can only point a domain to it, whereas I want the domain to act as an alias and to mimic precisely the URLs of all the old pages.</p>
<p>Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/11/copying-a-wp-site-into-wpmu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress 3</title>
		<link>http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/06/wordpress-3/</link>
		<comments>http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/06/wordpress-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 14:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/06/wordpress-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some time now, I have been playing around with WordPress 3, and I must confess I am disappointed. I have nothing against WordPress itself, but I expected something pretty radical with the advent of a major release, and for the general user there is very little there. Of course, one of the main features [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some time now, I have been playing around with WordPress 3, and I must confess I am disappointed.</p>
<p>I have nothing against WordPress itself, but I expected something pretty radical with the advent of a major release, and for the general user there is very little there.</p>
<p>Of course, one of the main features is the integration of WP with WPMU, but I wonder just how many use WPMU in the first place?</p>
<p>For the ordinary user, one of the major changes has been the departure from some of the default settings on installation.&#160; From the security standpoint, this is a good thing.&#160; No longer is Admin the default user, and the prefix to the database tables is now customisable, but the problem here is that it affects new installations only.&#160; An upgrade from V2 to V3 is going to leave the old defaults intact, and to avail of the new settings one would have to scrap the old site and do a fresh install.&#160; Even then, importing the old database into the new is going to be difficult, as all the table names will have changed.</p>
<p>Apart from the above, there are very few things that stand out.&#160; A new default theme?&#160; The ability to bulk update plugins?&#160; As I said, I expected more from a primary upgrade.</p>
<p>I still love WordPress as a package, but this isn’t something I would queue all night for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/06/wordpress-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A bit of an overhaul</title>
		<link>http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/03/a-bit-of-an-overhaul/</link>
		<comments>http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/03/a-bit-of-an-overhaul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 13:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/03/a-bit-of-an-overhaul/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the look of a site is important. First and foremost, it should be pleasing to the eye.&#160; It should also reflect the general content of the site, so that a simple glance at the screen should give an idea of the type of site it is. Customising a theme can be simple or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the look of a site is important.</p>
<p>First and foremost, it should be pleasing to the eye.&#160; It should also reflect the general content of the site, so that a simple glance at the screen should give an idea of the type of site it is.</p>
<p>Customising a theme can be simple or difficult, depending on how far you want to go.&#160; My philosophy is to take a theme that is as close as possible to my final desire, and then to make the minimum of changes.&#160; <a href="http://headrambles.com" target="_blank">Head Rambles</a>, for example has been through a couple of modifications.&#160; It is now heavily customised to the point where the original theme is almost unrecognisable.</p>
<p>As I said before, I wasn’t too happy with the theme here.&#160; I felt it was time for a radical overhaul of the entire site, both in look and name.</p>
<p>Why chose “A Pipe and a Keyboard”?&#160; Mainly because it sums up my necessities for writing.&#160; It is a personal site, with quite a bit of technical stuff, so the pipe represents the personal, and the keyboard represents the technical.&#160; </p>
<p>I chose the design for its simplicity.&#160; I like the simple layout, which doesn’t detract from the content, and apart from a few minor tweaks to the font, the only big change I have made (so far) is to substitute the banner image.&#160; There are a few changes to be made yet, of a minor nature, such as additional navigation and tweaks like that.&#160; I’m not too sure about the image, as yet.&#160; I know the pipe looks a little unusual, but it is the pipe I generally smoke, so it deserves its place on the Internet.&#160; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theotherfellow.com/2010/05/03/a-bit-of-an-overhaul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bulk editing blogroll entries</title>
		<link>http://theotherfellow.com/2010/04/27/bulk-editing-blogroll-entries/</link>
		<comments>http://theotherfellow.com/2010/04/27/bulk-editing-blogroll-entries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theotherfellow.com/2010/04/27/bulk-editing-blogroll-entries/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t profess to be a complete expert on WordPress and its finer workings. Whenever I want to do something like a bulk modification or something like that, I tend to search around for some kind of plugin or some other solution on the Internet.&#160; I am rarely disappointed. I have been doing some modifications [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t profess to be a complete expert on WordPress and its finer workings. </p>
<p>Whenever I want to do something like a bulk modification or something like that, I tend to search around for some kind of plugin or some other solution on the Internet.&#160; I am rarely disappointed.</p>
<p>I have been doing some modifications over on <a href="http://headrambles.com" target="_blank">Head Rambles</a> where I have shifted the links (Blogroll) onto a separate page.&#160; I wanted to go a little further with this and to do this, I needed to place the links into the database rather than have them hard coded on a page.</p>
<p>I am a great fan pf PHPMyAdmin, so writing up an SQL textfile to insert a batch of links into the Links Table was relatively simple.&#160; The Links Table had some legacy stuff in there so the result was a refreshed table with 147 entries.&#160; So far so good.</p>
<p>I wanted to set all my Links to a particular category, and this is where I ran into a problem.&#160; The last thing I wanted to do was to have to manually edit 147 entries and it would have been extremely slow and tedious.&#160; I searched high an low and found quite a few others trying to do the same thing, but no solutions.&#160; I had discovered the numerical identity of the category (it was 2) and tried a bulk change of the field ‘link_category’ to 2.&#160; This didn’t work, for some reason. </p>
<p>On delving a little further, I found that in fact the relationship between links and categories is held in the table Term_Relationships.&#160; As an experiment, I went back to my text editor and built up a series of inserts for this table &#8211; </p>
<blockquote><p>INSERT INTO `term_relationships` (`object_id`, `term_taxonomy_id`, `term_order`) VALUES     <br />(X, 2, 0),      <br />(X, 2, 0),      <br />(X, 2, 0);</p>
</blockquote>
<p>where X is the ID of the link.&#160; </p>
<p>On running this file, I got several errors indicating duplicate fields.&#160; These represented the legacy entries, which was fair enough.&#160; I just deleted the relevant entries from the text file.</p>
<p>Ultimately, my batch fix worked, and all the links are now entered under their correct categories.</p>
<p>I strikes me though that this would be a fine opportunity for someone to develop a plugin that does batch jobs on Links?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theotherfellow.com/2010/04/27/bulk-editing-blogroll-entries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
